800-809-2307
Four Letters. Infinite Potential.

Peer-to-Peer Evaluations are Critical to On-Going Board Excellence

By Keith Hughey, Senior Consultant 

As the financial services industry becomes more competitive and institutions continue to face regulatory and economic pressures, the need for a focused, informed board of directors is critical. In this challenging environment, it is essential that every board member be fully engaged in the institution’s governance, policies and procedures, and strategic direction in order for it to be successful in fulfilling its obligations to depositors and shareholders. 

Board member responsibilities begin with a commitment to be actively involved in all leadership aspects of the institution, including: 

  • actively participating in all board meetings; 
  • selecting qualified executive officers; 
  • providing governance on institutional policies related to safety and soundness; 
  • maintaining awareness and compliance with all state and federal regulations; 
  • assessing established business strategies; and 
  • serving as ambassadors for the purpose of growing the institution’s market share. 
The consequences of having directors who aren’t fully engaged or who don’t have the best interest of all stakeholders in mind can negatively impact an institution’s ability to make prudent business decisions and to meet its strategic objectives. If allowed to continue, this can result in potential regulatory consequences, and in the worst cases cause the institution to fail. 

What’s more, if directors don’t possess the basic knowledge required to understand the institution’s financial and accounting practices, neglect to complete their responsibilities or disregard the importance of protecting the interests of all stakeholders, they can be subject to civil monetary penalties imposed by regulators and civil liability. 

While large institutions are expected to incorporate self-assessment practices into their board governance, initiating a process that establishes strong expectations for board involvement and responsible decision-making is beneficial for smaller institutions as well. This can be accomplished through the implementation of an on-going board member evaluation process. 

Boards are only as strong as the weakest link 
In many institutions with long-term board members and legacy policies, member evaluations often aren’t given the serious attention they deserve. And while it’s no secret that board members don’t relish the idea of evaluating their peers, when an individual board member is no longer providing value to the group, it is distracting and affects the performance of the entire body. 

Unfortunately, in many cases institution and board leadership take the seemingly easy way out when it comes to removing non-contributing members by implementing a mandatory retirement age requirement or relying on the eventual retirement decision of individuals who may have lost interest or the ability to provide value. These strategies offer two very pronounced limitations to the preferred outcome of improving the quality and effectiveness of board membership. 

First of all, age isn’t always an indicator of whether or not someone is an effective, contributing board member. Automatically removing a member from the board at an arbitrary age can result in the loss of relevant industry and community knowledge, along with valuable institutional support and strong leadership abilities. And relying on underperforming members to decide on their own when it’s time to leave can take years and result in the loss of opportunities to make changes that would benefit the institution, both now and in the future.

These two scenarios are often the result of a board review process that is limited to a perfunctory self-assessment – where board members are asked to rate their own proficiencies and identify areas of potential weakness. This can have little value if a director is only concerned about his or her own needs, or doesn’t want to appear at odds with the opinions of the board chair or specific committee leadership. Too often the result of this type of review only serves to fulfill a board requirement and leads to the continuation of the status quo, whether good or bad. 

Peer-to-peer review allows relevant across-the-board assessment
However, by developing a peer-to-peer review system for evaluating each member’s contributions, board leadership demonstrates its commitment to maintaining quality involvement of all board members, all the time. 

Anonymous peer-to-peer evaluations provide a vehicle for obtaining feedback to evaluate each person’s value as a board member. To be effective, the process should include the following elements to ensure consistent, quality input on issues that directly relate to the successful oversight of the financial institution: 

  • a clear, upfront establishment of process objectives, as well as criteria to be used for member evaluations;
  • development of an unbiased format that provides constructive, non-personal information; 
  • identification of a neutral party to gather and share individual feedback; and 
  • consideration of how the evaluation responses will affect on-going board membership. 
Once the evaluation process is complete, underperforming members can be counseled and given the opportunity to improve their performance or increase board involvement before a final recommendation is made to find a replacement. 

Planning and expectations promote healthy board involvement 
While the issue of dealing with underperforming board members is difficult, if a board is going to function as a unit, it is incumbent on every member to fully commit to his or her responsibilities for the duration of their board service. 

The process can be eased by implementing clear expectations of membership requirements during the recruiting process and addressing institutional leadership needs on a regular basis. It is also imperative that board members are given the training and information they need to stay aware of changing market and regulatory conditions. When weaknesses or deficiencies are observed, it is the responsibility of board leadership to address the situation immediately with the individual member and discuss possible solutions. 

With this process in place, every member will have a better understanding of what is required to have and maintain a seat at the board table.

 

12 months 2020 2020 vision 40 years abusive abusiveness Academy account holder account holder retention account holder strategies account holder strategies; growth strategies; account holders accountability Achieve achievements Advancements Advice Agreement analysis Analytics announcement Assistance ATMs Attendees attorneys attracting talent Automation B2B Balance Bank Bank of Pacific Banking banking services banks banks and credit unions batching Benefit best practices board governance board member board of directors Bob Layendecker bottom line branch equipment branch profitability branding Bryan Hanks budget bundling business business culture business environment business practices business processes business strategies career advice Career Goal case studies Case Study CEO CEO onboarding certainty CFPB Challenges change charitable Cher Cheryl Lawson Choose Chris Karstens claim clarity class action Classroom clients Cloud Cohron CommFirst Federal Credit Union commitment Communication communications communities community Community Outreach Referral Program Competition Competitive Complaint Compliance compliance examinations compliance risks compliant condition conduct Conferences Consistency Consistent consultant Consultation consulting Consumer Consumer FInancial Protection Bureau consumer protection Consumer-focused Consumers Contingency Contingency Pricing contingency-based fees Contract Contract Analysis Contract Negotiation contract negotiations Contract Optimizer Contract Renegotiations contract review contract staffing Contracts Convenience core processor contracts Cornerstone Credit Union League coronavirus corporate culture corporate governance costs Courtesy Pay COVID-19 CPE credits Credit Card credit card contracts credit cards Credit Union credit unions Crissandra Fry CSS culture customer service cyber security Damian Data Data Analytics database Deal debit card contracts Debt deceptive Decisions Demand Letters Deposit Development Dick Miller digital directors Disclosed disclosures discounts Discussion Dodd-Frank Act donation Donna Sumrall Dynamic economy Education efficiency studies election Email Emergencies Emergency employee employee retention employees EMV migration enforce enforcement Engagement Errors evaluation Evolve executive search Expectations Expense expense management expense reduction expenses Experience Expert expert negotiations Experts Facilitators FastTrack FDIC Federal Reserve Federal Reserve Board fee Feedback fees Financial Financial Institution financial institutions financial services financial stability Financial Worry FinTech Fixed limits Floyd's Forum Free Analysis full disclosure Fully fully disclosed overdraft program funds Gen Z Generating Income generating leads generation Generation Z Gift Goals governance government Grow Gym Halloween Hammond Happiness health hiring HKW Holiday Holidays HR HR policies Hubur human capital human resources Implementation important Improved improved efficiencies improved results Inc. income income enhancement Innovate Innovative Institution interests interview strategies interview tips IT contracts Jackson Jai Jai Darden James Jamone Moore Jan Southern Jennifer Peoples Jennifer Simmons Jim Griffis Jimmy Nguyen JMFA JMFA Academy JMFA clients JMFA News JMFA Next Generation Overdraft Privilege Joe Marsh John Cohron John M. Floyd John M. Floyd & Associates judicial justification Kelly Flynn Kennedy law lawsuits Lawyer leaders leadership Learn Learning Legal legislative lending program Lesson Limit Limits Literacy litigation litigators loans local Long Term Long-Term lost revenue Maggie Thompson Maintenance manage management Mark Roe marketing marketplace Matrix Matrix-based measurable measurable results Member Members Midwest Region Millennial Millennials Mississippi Missouri Mobile Banking monetary Money Most Valuable Provider NAFCU NCUA Negative Settlement Negotiate negotiating contracts negotiator Net Operating Analysis New Decade New Year New Year's Next Generation JMFA Overdraft Privilege NOA Non-Interest Income NSF fees OCC Oliver Ireland onboarding Online Opportunities Opportunity Opt-In Organizational Health Outcomes outsourcing Overdraft overdraft compliance overdraft coverage overdraft fees overdraft practices Overdraft Privilege overdraft privilege program overdraft program Overdraft programs overdraft protection programs Overdraft Protection Service overdraft service overdraft services overdraft strategy overdrafts Overspending Partner Paul McFarland paycheck emergency payday loans Payments Pennsylvania performance personnel plan planning Plus4 Credit Union Policy POS Positive Swipe practice practices Press Release Privilege Manager CRM proactive procedure process process improvement Processing product profitability Productivity Products Professional Profitability Improvement Program Program Management programs prohibited project staffing Promotions Proposals Provider providers Quality Reactive reality Recruitment Services recruitment strategies refer referral Reg E regional director regulation regulations regulators regulatory relationship Relationships Renegotiate Renewal Reporting Reputation resolutions Resources Results Retail Retaining Employees Retention Retirement revenue revenue enhancement review Richard Miller risk risks ROI Ron Jennings Roy Roy Seifert Rules Ryan Armstrong Sales Satisfaction savings secrets Security senate service service agreements service contracts service delivery Services Sessions settlement shareholders Sheila Bridges Shopping social distancing Social Events social media Software Solution Spending staff staff development staff spotlight staff training staffing staffing gaps staffing studies staffing study stakeholders standard Statistics Strategic Planning Strategies Strategy Stressful succeed Success success factors Succession plan succession planning Support survey Susan Prell talent team team members technology technology costs technology upgrades technology utilization temporary staff term Text third-party providers threat three Tim Strandquist Time Tools Tracking Trainer training transaction Transparency Transparent Travel Treats trends Trey Martin Trust UDAAP unfair updates Upgrades Value Variable Vendor vendor agreements vendor contracts vendor performance vendors violation Walker Washington Webinars weeks Westmoreland Community FCU Whitney & Company Wish list women work Workshops