800-809-2307
Four Letters. Infinite Potential.

Failure to Renegotiate Card Contracts has Consequences

By Kelly Flynn, National Director

As the old saying goes, timing is everything. Having the right products and services in place when members need them can be critical for credit unions in today’s ever-changing environment. Likewise, as the October deadline for transitioning to new, more secure EMV (Europay, MasterCard and Visa) fraud-protection technology nears, credit unions should be taking a serious look at existing credit and debit card provider contracts to make sure they are getting the best price, contract terms and service available.

When I began talking to banks and credit unions last year about the importance of reviewing their credit and debit card provider contracts in anticipation of the transition to new pin and chip technology, I discovered that many are losing out on significant savings, revenue and service upgrades by failing to renegotiate credit and debit card provider contracts that have been in place for years. In one instance, a credit union was still operating within the outdated terms of a contract that originated in the 1990s.

Since this initial contract was signed, no efforts had been made to review the cost and terms, or to shop other providers to see if they were getting the best prices and services for their needs.

The time spent to review contract terms has many rewards
And while I understand that the cost and time involved in switching card vendors can be daunting, making the decision to simply stick with what you have had for years can have consequences, such as losing out on significant savings potential, improved contract terms, opportunities for increased revenue and updated services.

In addition to ensuring that members are receiving the latest in fraud protection, a review of your existing credit and debit card provider contracts can give credit unions the opportunity to benefit from lower fees, discounts, signing bonuses and other incentives, not to mention reduced processing costs and increased net revenue over the terms of the contract.

For example, our team was recently involved in contract negotiations for a client in the Southeast that was using two different vendors for its debit and credit card processing services. The goal was to combine the services under one provider to reduce expenses and streamline the process. Through the RFP, the two existing vendors provided bids on both debit and credit card processing services. After successful negotiations, the financial institution selected the vendor that offered improved serviceability, a $150,000 signing bonus, plus more than $200,000 in annual cost savings.

Additionally, negotiations with the debit and credit card provider led to over $100,000 per year in rebates/bonuses, plus increased interchange income of $115,000 annually by switching card brands. The vendors also agreed to pay for the mass reissuing of the new EMV cards for the financial institution's account holders, a value of more than $40,000.

Keep in mind that by not paying attention the details, you could potentially pay higher rates much longer than necessary. Not only has improved technology substantially lowered the cost of card transactions, there are likely other competitive offers to consider as well. If you don’t ask for a contract review, the vendor isn’t obligated to offer better rates or improved service.

Plus, failure to conduct a review of the contract services and terms can put an institution at risk of failing to meet its due diligence requirements for maintaining industry standards and practices regarding regulatory compliance and account holder protection. In today’s highly regulated environment, this seemingly simple oversight can lead to costly violations.

Timing is everything when it comes to contract reviews
In my conversations with banks and credit unions, it is apparent that the time needed to review and renegotiate service contracts with providers, as well as the anticipated costs involved in re-issuing new cards from a different vendor, are two major concerns. Unfortunately the outcome means they are potentially leaving thousands of dollars in savings and revenue opportunities on the table.

If the time required is an issue for your organization and you have different providers for credit and debit cards, and card processing, look for ways to simplify the process. From my experience, offsetting the additional costs to keep your organization efficient, while maintaining the latest technology, is always up for negotiation.

Another problem is waiting too long to even start the review or renegotiation process.

Typically, negotiations on a credit or debit card contract should begin 12-18 months before the contract is set to auto renew. A non-renewal notice is usually required between 90-180 days in advance to avoid any possibility of the contract renewing automatically. If notice is not provided, the credit union could be locked into the original price and contract terms of the past agreement.

Put time on your side with a proactive review of your existing card contracts
Before your current contracts for credit and debit cards, as well as core processing expire, take the time to audit your existing agreements – consider renegotiating with current providers and looking at alternatives to make sure you are getting the best service at a competitive price.

With the upcoming EMV integration deadline approaching, finding the time to negotiate cost savings and increased revenue possibilities is without a doubt a top priority. Plus, if your current vendor doesn’t offer the best deal, maybe it’s time to look for one that does.


To learn more about uncovering savings opportunities by renegotiating your service contracts contact Kelly Flynn at Kelly.Flynn@JMFA.com or call 800-809-2307.

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message:
x
account holder account holder retention account holder strategies account holder strategies; growth strategies; account holders announcement attracting talent Bank of Pacific banks batching best practices board governance board member board of directors bottom line branch profitability branding Bryan Hanks budget business culture business environment business strategies career advice Case Study CEO onboarding CFPB Charles Shanley Cheryl Lawson Chris Karstens communications Compliance compliance examinations compliance risks Consumer FInancial Protection Bureau Contract Optimizer Contract Renegotiations contract review contract staffing core processor contracts corporate culture corporate governance CPE credits credit card contracts credit cards credit unions Crissandra Fry CSS culture customer service cyber security Darin Byrd debit card contracts digital directors economy efficiency studies election employee employee retention employees EMV migration evaluation executive search expense management expense reduction expense studies expenses Federal Reserve Board fees financial services financial stability Floyd's Forum full disclosure Generating Income generating leads generation governance government hiring HR HR Consulting HR policies human capital human resources income income enhancement interview strategies interview tips IT contracts Jan Southern Jennifer Peoples Jim Griffis JMFA Academy JMFA clients JMFA News job search John M. Floyd Keith Hughey Kelly Flynn Kim Kreps leaders leadership lending program Linda Meyer loans management Mark Roe marketing Midwest Region Millennial Millennials Missouri NCUA negotiating contracts Net Operating Analysis NOA Non-Interest Income Oliver Ireland onboarding Organizational Health outsourcing overdraft compliance overdraft coverage overdraft fees overdraft practices Overdraft Privilege overdraft program Overdraft programs overdraft protection programs overdraft service overdraft strategy overdrafts Paul McFarland payday loans Pennsylvania performance improvement personnel planning Press Release Privilege Manager CRM process improvement product profitability Profitability Improvement project staffing Recruiting Recruitment Services recruitment strategies re-engineering regional director regulations regulators regulatory Retaining Employees revenue revenue enhancement Richard Miller ROI Ron Jennings senate service service agreements shareholders social media staff staff development staff spotlight staffing staffing gaps staffing studies staffing study stakeholders Strategic Planning Succession plan succession planning Susan Prell talent technology technology costs technology utilization temporary staff Tim Strandquist training UDAAP vendors Washington Westmoreland Community FCU