800-809-2307
Four Letters. Infinite Potential.

Disparate Impact Studies Especially Tough on Dynamic Matrix Systems

By Richard Miller

Executive Vice President

 

As regulations on financial products and services continue to rank among the top concerns for banks and credit unions, many are re-evaluating the viability of the products they offer to their account holders.

 

Overdraft matrix systems are complicated algorithms that have come under increased scrutiny insofar as their effect on protected classes. These programs are not transparent and are based on an abstract set of parameters or a complex matrix of eligibility requirements that are suspected of having a disparate impact on certain account holder segments.

 

When program eligibility favors one group of potential users over others, or restricts access to the service based upon abstract or subjective factors, compliance violations as well as damage to account holder relationships may occur.

 

Avoid risk of disparate impact with consistent overdraft program eligibility criteria

When it comes to on-going regulatory review of overdraft solutions, banks and credit unions can rest easy if their program is fully disclosed and provides specific eligibility requirements for all customers. For example, the use of unbiased criteria that pertain to everyone reduces the likelihood of criticism or negative consumer impact.

 

Also, consider that programs based on ad hoc decisions were common in the days when a bank officer or branch manager would review account overdrafts early every morning and decide whose check to pay and whose to deny, often based on subjective criteria. Today that practice could be equated to having a disparate impact on account holders who were denied the service.

 

With the availability of fully transparent overdraft solutions, you can avoid inconsistent decisions when it comes to overdraft program eligibility requirements. The key is to select a program provider that uses criteria that are objective and based on conditions that are common to all account holders. This will help to alleviate any compliance concerns regarding discrimination or disparate impact against any particular customer or member segment.

 

For best results, look for a compliance-tested, regulator-approved program

Financial institutions and outside vendors that have created their own eligibility criteria – based on an abstract set of parameters or a complex matrix of eligibility requirements – run the risk of negative examiner reaction and the possibility of adverse action by a class of consumers.

 

Did your bank or credit union turn off your overdraft program as a result of increased regulatory scrutiny? Or, could your current eligibility requirements put the institution at risk of being cited for discrimination and disparate impact by examiners?

 

In either case, your overdraft program should provide you with regulatory peace of mind and an easy-to-manage, reliable source of non-interest income. Likewise, more of your account holders will have the opportunity to access a compliant service that helps them maintain a healthy bottom line, as well. If you have any concerns about the program you have in place, consider a review of your program to ensure it is the best solution for your bank or credit union as well as the market you serve. 

 

Published on CB Insight  and CU Insight

 

View more related articles

Get a free assessment of your program

Learn more about JMFA OVERDRAFT PRIVILEGE®

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message:
x
account holder account holder retention account holder strategies account holder strategies; growth strategies; account holders announcement attracting talent Bank of Pacific banks batching best practices board governance board member board of directors bottom line branch profitability branding Bryan Hanks budget business culture business environment business strategies career advice Case Study CEO onboarding CFPB Charles Shanley Cheryl Lawson Chris Karstens communications Compliance compliance examinations compliance risks Consumer FInancial Protection Bureau Contract Optimizer Contract Renegotiations contract review contract staffing core processor contracts corporate culture corporate governance CPE credits credit card contracts credit cards credit unions Crissandra Fry CSS culture customer service cyber security Darin Byrd debit card contracts digital directors economy efficiency studies election employee employee retention employees EMV migration evaluation executive search expense management expense reduction expense studies expenses Federal Reserve Board fees financial services financial stability Floyd's Forum full disclosure Generating Income generating leads generation governance government hiring HR HR Consulting HR policies human capital human resources income income enhancement interview strategies interview tips IT contracts Jan Southern Jennifer Peoples Jim Griffis JMFA Academy JMFA clients JMFA News job search John M. Floyd Keith Hughey Kelly Flynn Kim Kreps leaders leadership lending program Linda Meyer loans management Mark Roe marketing Midwest Region Millennial Millennials Missouri NCUA negotiating contracts Net Operating Analysis NOA Non-Interest Income Oliver Ireland onboarding Organizational Health outsourcing overdraft compliance overdraft coverage overdraft fees overdraft practices Overdraft Privilege overdraft program Overdraft programs overdraft protection programs overdraft service overdraft strategy overdrafts Paul McFarland payday loans Pennsylvania performance improvement personnel planning Press Release Privilege Manager CRM process improvement product profitability Profitability Improvement project staffing Recruiting Recruitment Services recruitment strategies re-engineering regional director regulations regulators regulatory Retaining Employees revenue revenue enhancement Richard Miller ROI Ron Jennings senate service service agreements shareholders social media staff staff development staff spotlight staffing staffing gaps staffing studies staffing study stakeholders Strategic Planning Succession plan succession planning Susan Prell talent technology technology costs technology utilization temporary staff Tim Strandquist training UDAAP vendors Washington Westmoreland Community FCU